A comparison of condom distribution versus abstinence in schools

This disease infects 10, 13 to 21 year olds yearly. The goal then was to reduce social problems such as venereal disease and prostitution by educating the public about sex. The two main options discussed are teaching abstinence, and condom distribution. No condom usage at all.

As a matter of fact, one mother withdrew her student from the school, and found the child education at another facility. If they get pregnant they are screwed. One school that implemented an abstinence only curriculum had major objections by members of the community.

Abstinence methods are usually ineffective to students who are already sexually active. The United States has the highest teen pregnancy rate of any developed nation, and worldwide, more than one million teenagers become pregnant each year.

Many districts have already begun to do this. Many different methods of condom distribution have been tried, from anonymous, unlimited supply, to special handouts after discussing your situation with a school counselor.

Parents and family have the role of teaching their children values, and morals, and discussing sexual issues with their children voluntarily, so that the children in return, can come to the parents when they need to.

The analysis found that these programs increased condom use, the acquisition of condoms, and condom carrying. Proponents claim that condom distribution lets students know that the community cares about their total health and well being and that there are adults who are prepared to deal with the reality of their lives rather than maintain a position of denial about adolescent sexual behavior.

It found no evidence that access increased sexual risk-taking or sexual activity. Sex education also does not increase sexual activity; in fact, numerous studies have found that young people who take highly effective sex education and HIV-prevention programs tend to delay sex and have fewer partners.

However, Con will probably disagree, and thus I will respond. Unfortunately, Con fails to realize the implications. Teaching abstinence seriously offends some parents, and their students. The real goal and issue the resolution addresses is simply a matter of reducing unwanted pregnancies and reducing STI transmission.

A study by the Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health at the University of California, San Francisco, for example, looked at 16 studies on the effect of making emergency contraception EC available to adult and adolescent women.

Studies show that condom distribution does increase condom use among sexually active students, and that it neither hastens initiation of sexual activity nor results in greater frequency of intercourse among students.

Parents and family have the role of teaching their children values, and morals, and discussing sexual issues with their children voluntarily, so that the children in return, can come to the parents when they need to.

The decisions that we make now will decide if we: However, if people can pull together, and help be part of the solution, it is likely that we can make a difference, and help our youth make good healthy decisions.

When it comes to safe sex, there is a lot more than just using a condom. The AAP statement also points to a recent meta-analysis of interventions to increase condom access, conducted both in the United States and internationally. Throughout the United States, school districts and states are basing their policies around these two ideas.

We know that teens are doing this, so how can we not teach them how to do it safely? Condom availability programs have been researched numerous times with similar results. As Rewire has noted in the pastthese arguments have been disproven time and time again.

Condoms in Schools: A Smart Move, But a Tough Sell

Legislature passes bill planning High School Condom Distribution. School should focus on educating the children, which it is clearly failing to do. The second controversial option for school sex-ed solutions is distributing condoms in schools.

The decisions that we make now will decide if we: That is the parents job. It is argued that only teaching abstinence cheats youth out of knowledge they deserve to have, since they are physically capable of intercourse, and many of them do choose to be sexually involved.

Internet Schaefer, Charles E. Yes kids do not need to be having kids.Condoms in Schools: A Smart Move, But a Tough Sell Dec 3,pm Martha Kempner A local television station asked San Antonio parents how they felt about the American Academy of Pediactrics' new suggestion that schools make condoms available to students.

Hence, the distribution of condoms contradicts a school's attempts to promote abstinence. ” What Con neglects to realize (or rather communicate), is that schools and their faculty are generally not in % agreement with themselves regarding.

It looks at various opinions on both sides of the argument and comes out in favor of condom distribution because abstinence-only programs do not work. From the Paper: "There is an ongoing debate about what to teach in sex education in schools and whether to promote abstinence or to distribute condoms.

condom distribution vs abstinence in schools Limited Time Offer at Lots of mint-body.com!!! We have made a special deal with a well known Professional Research Paper. abstinence in schools Sexual Education was introduced to the American Public School System inat the beginning of this century.

Superintendent of Schools, Ella Flagg Young promoted the teaching of sex education, and implemented sex hygiene lectures in the Chicago, IL, school system. compare and contrast. Home; A Comparison of Condom Distribution Versus Abstinence in Schools PAGES 4.

CONDOM DISTRIBUTION VS ABSTINENCE IN SCHOOLS

WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: sexual education, condom distribution, american public school system, abstinence in schools. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student .

Download
A comparison of condom distribution versus abstinence in schools
Rated 0/5 based on 28 review