Unfair promotion at the food chain

A large retailer concludes an annual contract with a small cheese producer for the purchase of a specialty cheese at a determined price. In case of proven infringement, the responsible body will be competent to impose a proportionate and dissuasive sanction. The unfair trading practices to be banned are late payments for perishable food products, last minute order cancellations, unilateral or retroactive changes to contracts and forcing the supplier to pay for wasted products.

The proposals build on an existing voluntary code of best practice in the supply chain, known as the Supply Chain Initiative SCI. The proposed measures are complementary to measures existing in Member States and the code of conduct of the voluntary Supply Chain Initiative.

European Commission to ban unfair trade practices in food supply chain

Other practices will only be permitted if subject to a clear and unambiguous upfront agreement between the parties: The SCI was developed as a result of the Commission-led High-Level Forum on a Better Functioning Food Supply Chain established in to help develop policy in the food and drink sector and contribute to a better functioning food supply chain.

This has led to increasing regulatory divergence across the EU. In case of proven infringement, the responsible body will be competent to impose a proportionate and dissuasive sanction.

It encourages dispute resolution between parties, which can help to avoid lengthy and cumbersome legal action. While such differences in bargaining power are common and legitimate in commercial relationships, they may sometimes lead to unfair trading practices UTPs.

Unfair promotion at the food chain, in Decemberthe Council called on the Commission to undertake an impact assessment with a view to proposing an EU legislative framework or other non-legislative measures to address unfair trading practices.

An efficient and effective food supply chain is a fair one. The Green Paper consultation elicited responses from a broad range of stakeholder categories.

Does the approach suggested in the Communication have implications at international level? By setting minimum standards and reinforcing the enforcement, the proposal should ensure that these operators are able to compete on fair terms, thereby contributing to the overall efficiency of the chain.

Smaller operators in the food supply chain, including farmers, are vulnerable to unfair trading practices employed by partners in the chain. Such economic imbalances and the resulting differences in bargaining power can lead to UTPs that invariably affect the weaker party in the commercial relationship — in most cases SMEs.

Unfair Trading Practices are practices that deviate from good commercial conduct and are contrary to good faith and fair dealing. In this case, measures against UTPs can be significantly strengthened by the possibility for the weaker party to have recourse to an independent enforcement authority or body that is able to protect the confidentiality of the complainant.

The proposed measures are complementary to measures existing in Member States and the code of conduct of the voluntary Supply Chain Initiative. The following examples illustrate possible UTPs in the food supply chain: As a consequence, in Member States where litigation through courts is the only possible way of tackling UTPs, enforcement of any rules addressing the type of UTPs described in the communication is very limited.

Member States can take further measures as they see fit. Broadly, UTPs can be defined as practices that grossly deviate from good commercial conduct, are contrary to good faith and fair dealing and are unilaterally imposed by one trading partner on its counter-party.

Tackling unfair trading practices in the food supply chain

This enforcement authority will be able to initiate investigations of its own initiative or based on a complaint. Member States can take further measures as they see fit. By setting minimum standards and reinforcing the enforcement, the proposal should ensure that these operators are able to compete on fair terms, thereby contributing to the overall efficiency of the chain.

The proposed measures are complementary to measures existing in Member States and the code of conduct of the voluntary Supply Chain Initiative. Other Member States have not taken any action at all. This would facilitate a common understanding between Member States and would create a consistent basis for independent enforcement.

The focus of the communication is to address the issue of UTPs in the Single Market and reduce the level of regulatory divergence between the 28 Member States.

This is a clear statement for more fair business conduct. The SCI was developed as a result of the Commission-led High-Level Forum on a Better Functioning Food Supply Chain established in to help develop policy in the food and drink sector and contribute to a better functioning food supply chain.

In particular, companies joining need to adjust their internal processes and organisation to meet the requirements of the Supply Chain Initiative. An efficient and effective food supply chain is a fair one. Other practices will only be permitted if subject to a clear and unambiguous upfront agreement between the parties: When the supplier points out that the promotional activity was not referred to in the contract and mentions the possibility of legal action, the retailer threatens to terminate the commercial relationship.

In addition, the proposal includes effective enforcement provisions: The Supply Chain Initiative was launched in September and is based on a set of principles of good practice, which were agreed by participants of the Forum for a Better Functioning Food Supply Chain, a stakeholder body set up by the Commission in The legislation also allows for a report by the Commission on the application of the rules after three years, including on any impact on prices.

In the middle of the contracting period, the retailer informs the supplier about a promotional anniversary campaign run in all retail outlets during one week.The European Commission has proposed to ban the certain trading practices in the food supply chain to ensure fairer treatment for small and medium-sized food and farming businesses.

It says the smaller operators in the food chain, such as farmers, are vulnerable to unfair trading practices and often. The European Commission has announced new regulations to ban unfair trade practices which damage farmers in the food supply chain.

Charge suppliers for the promotion or marketing of the products they are selling. Unfair Trading Practices in the Business-to-Business Food Supply Chain PE 3 Communication Tackling unfair trading practices in the business-to-business food supply.

European Commission to ban unfair trade practices in the food supply chain The Commission is targeting the most damaging unfair trade practices to grant farmers and small and medium sized.

Unfair Promotion at the Food Chain Words | 4 Pages I. Case Study Joel Reyes, the newly hired officer at the Food Chain, Inc.

was jolted by the conversation he just had with Ria Tolentino, an employee at the counter. The food supply chain is particularly vulnerable to unfair trading practices due to large differences in bargaining power.

This is why the Commission proposed today to ban the more damaging unfair trading practices in the food supply chain to ensure fairer treatment for small and medium sized food and farming businesses.

Download
Unfair promotion at the food chain
Rated 3/5 based on 18 review